Join the NOVA Awards Judging Panel and Help Define Excellence

We invite esteemed professionals and industry leaders to take an active role in shaping one of the most prestigious awards in business and innovation. As a judge, you will assess groundbreaking achievements and help recognize the visionaries setting new industry standards. Your insights and expertise will contribute to elevating global benchmarks of excellence. This is your opportunity to influence the future—apply today to join the NOVA Awards judging panel.

Key Details About the Judging Role:

No Costs or Payments Involved: Judging for the NOVA Awards is entirely voluntary. No fees are required for consideration, and no compensation is provided. Selection is based solely on expertise and professional credentials.

Rigorous Selection Process: Not all applicants are immediately chosen. Our panel is carefully curated to ensure only the most qualified professionals contribute. With multiple award categories, judges are added based on specific needs for each program.
Minimum Review Requirement: Judges must complete at least 50 reviews to qualify for an official eCertificate. This ensures meaningful evaluation of submissions spanning industries and global markets.

Peer-Driven Recognition: Selected judges are accomplished experts with a proven ability to provide insightful evaluations, reinforcing the integrity and prestige of the awards.

Enhance Your Professional Credibility: Serving as a NOVA Awards judge highlights your expertise, industry leadership, and commitment to excellence—an acknowledgment that strengthens your professional reputation.
Make an Impact: Your participation will help uphold and advance the standards of excellence across industries, recognizing those whose work is shaping the future.

Transparency & Accountability: To maintain the highest level of integrity, all judges are publicly listed on the official NOVA Awards website, ensuring transparency and recognition for their contributions.

Commitment Required: Applying to be a judge signifies a serious responsibility. Judges must dedicate time to thoroughly evaluate entries and provide well-considered feedback. Only apply if you can commit to this process.

Join the NOVA Awards judging panel and take part in honoring the visionaries driving innovation and excellence.

Introduction to NOVA Awards Judges

Recognizing the Experts Behind the NOVA Awards Selection Process

The NOVA Awards judges are a distinguished panel of professionals who voluntarily contribute their expertise to assess and evaluate nominations. Representing a broad spectrum of industries and specializations, these judges are not financially compensated but are deeply committed to upholding the principles of fairness, transparency, and integrity throughout the selection process. Their deep understanding of evaluation criteria ensures a rigorous and unbiased approach to determining the most deserving recipients.

Our judging panel consists of seasoned executives, industry pioneers, and subject-matter experts, each selected for their leadership, analytical skills, and ability to objectively assess high-caliber submissions. Their role is instrumental in maintaining the prestige of the NOVA Awards, ensuring that only the most outstanding achievements and innovations receive global recognition.

Why You Should Volunteer as a NOVA Awards Judge

Harness the Power of Recognition and Influence
As a volunteer judge for the prestigious NOVA Awards, you have a unique opportunity to shape the future of excellence by recognizing groundbreaking achievements across industries. Your insights and expertise will play a pivotal role in evaluating and honoring visionary leaders, innovators, and trailblazers who redefine their fields.

By joining our panel, you gain exclusive exposure to emerging industry trends, expand your professional network, and contribute to a globally recognized initiative that sets new standards of distinction. This is your chance to leave a lasting impact on the landscape of innovation and leadership while enhancing your own professional standing.

Apply today and be part of a movement that celebrates and elevates true excellence.

What to Expect as a Judge

Time Commitment and Process

Judges are expected to dedicate a reasonable amount of time, completing at least 50 assignments, with each evaluation requiring no more than 15 minutes. While some reviews may take less time, the total commitment averages around 12.5 hours. Importantly, no physical attendance is required; all evaluations are conducted online at your convenience.

Security and Confidentiality

To ensure the integrity of the judging process, judges are prohibited from downloading, copying, or capturing any content from the secure judges’ portal. This policy safeguards the confidentiality of submissions and upholds the professionalism and ethical standards of the NOVA Awards.

Requesting Employer Approval

Subject: Request for Approval to Serve as a Judge for the NOVA Awards

Dear [Manager’s Name],

I am writing to seek your approval to participate as a judge for the prestigious NOVA Awards. This role involves reviewing submissions and helping identify industry-leading achievements in categories relevant to our field.

Benefits to the Company:

1. Professional Development: This opportunity will enhance my knowledge of industry innovations and best practices, which I can apply in our projects.
2. Enhanced Visibility: My involvement positions our company as a leader with recognized experts contributing to industry standards.
3. Knowledge Sharing: Insights gained can be shared with our team, benefiting strategic initiatives and operational improvements.

The judging process is conducted entirely online, with flexible scheduling to ensure minimal disruption to my regular responsibilities.

I am committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards, avoiding conflicts of interest, and representing our organization with professionalism.

Thank you for considering my request. I am happy to provide further details if needed.

Best regards,
[Your Name]

Template for Employer’s Approval

[Employer’s Letterhead]

Subject: Approval for [Employee’s Name] to Participate as a NOVA Awards Judge

[Date]

To Whom It May Concern,

This letter confirms our support for [Employee’s Full Name], [Job Title], to serve as a judge for the upcoming NOVA Awards. We believe that [his/her/their] expertise in [specific field] and professional accomplishments make [him/her/them] an excellent candidate for this role.

We are confident that [Employee’s Name] will contribute significantly to the awards process and represent our organization with distinction.

Sincerely,
[Employer’s Name]
[Job Title]
[Organization]

How Will a Judge Get Access?

Most categories are judged online. The scoring process will take you a few minutes to as much time as you can volunteer to read and score in our online judging system, anytime day or night. You may start or stop the process anytime.

As a judge, it will be an opportunity for you to learn how other individuals, teams, and organizations are performing, confronting challenges, and achieving success in the industry.

You’ll also receive an eCertificate of appreciation suitable for sharing online, and on social media, and be acknowledged with your biography on the NOVA Awards website.

Your contact details will be safe and not shared with anyone.

Selection Process and Criteria

Email Policy – Use Only Work/Business Email

The NOVA Awards is exclusively designed for established professionals and business leaders. We strictly do not correspond with personal or generic email addresses, regardless of the number of reminders sent. To maintain the integrity of our communication, responses will only be sent to verified work or business emails.

If your work email has changed, please notify us with both your new and previous business email addresses to ensure continuity in your participation. If you are currently transitioning between roles, we kindly ask that you reach out once you have obtained your new business email.

How NOVA Awards Judges Are Selected

The NOVA Awards uphold a meticulous and rigorous selection process to ensure that only the most qualified and accomplished professionals join our esteemed judging panel. Judges are chosen based on their industry expertise, professional achievements, and commitment to fairness and integrity. Our goal is to maintain the highest standards in evaluating excellence, ensuring that each nomination is reviewed with expertise, impartiality, and professionalism.

Criteria for Selection

Extensive Industry Experience: Judges are selected based on their proven track record and deep expertise within their respective fields. Their insights provide a critical perspective in evaluating submissions with accuracy and discernment.

Qualifications and Accomplishments: Each judge is assessed on their professional background, certifications, and notable achievements. Their credentials ensure they possess the necessary knowledge to conduct a rigorous evaluation of award entries.

Impartiality and Integrity: Fairness and ethical judgment are fundamental to the selection process. Judges are chosen for their unwavering commitment to unbiased decision-making, ensuring credibility and transparency in evaluations.

Rigorous Selection Process: Our recruitment process involves a thorough evaluation of a candidate’s experience, leadership, and contributions to their industry. Only individuals who meet our high standards of excellence are invited to join the judging panel.

Industry Knowledge and Understanding: Judges must demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the specific industry categories within the awards program. This ensures an evaluation process that is aligned with sector-specific benchmarks and best practices.

Commitment to Confidentiality: All judges are required to adhere to strict confidentiality protocols, safeguarding the sensitive information contained within award submissions. Any breach of confidentiality results in immediate disqualification from the panel.

Diversity and Inclusion: The NOVA Awards prioritizes a diverse judging panel that reflects a broad spectrum of backgrounds, perspectives, and expertise. A well-rounded approach ensures fair and balanced evaluations across all categories.

Continuous Learning and Development: Judges are encouraged to remain at the forefront of industry trends, market innovations, and emerging best practices to provide informed and forward-thinking evaluations.

Adherence to Judging Guidelines: To maintain consistency and fairness, all judges are provided with detailed evaluation guidelines. This ensures a standardized approach across all submissions, reinforcing the credibility of the NOVA Awards.

Feedback and Improvement: We actively seek input from our judging panel to refine and enhance the awards process. Continuous feedback ensures that the program evolves, maintaining its status as a globally recognized benchmark for excellence.

Through this meticulous selection process, the NOVA Awards maintain the highest standards of recognition, ensuring that only the most outstanding achievements and innovations are honored.

Exploring the Benefits and Privileges of NOVA Awards Judges

A participating judge receives the following:

• An eBadge and eCertificate emailed after scoring at least 50 assignments.
• Judge’s full name published on NOVA Awards website with a link to an external site such as LinkedIn for profile.

Exclusive Benefits & Privileges of Being a NOVA Awards Judge

Becoming a judge for the NOVA Awards is more than just an honorary title—it is an opportunity to elevate your professional standing, expand your industry influence, and contribute to shaping the future of excellence. As a distinguished member of our judging panel, you gain access to a suite of exclusive benefits designed to enhance your credibility, broaden your network, and immerse you in groundbreaking innovations.

Industry Recognition

• Establish yourself as a thought leader and industry expert by being affiliated with one of the most prestigious awards programs. Your role as a NOVA Awards judge reinforces your authority and influence within your professional sphere.

Elite Networking Opportunities

• Join an exclusive community of top-tier professionals, executives, and industry innovators. Forge meaningful connections with fellow judges, industry leaders, and potential collaborators, expanding your influence across global networks.

Insider Access to Innovation

• Be among the first to explore cutting-edge breakthroughs, disruptive technologies, and pioneering business strategies showcased in award submissions. Stay ahead of emerging trends and gain firsthand insights into the future of your industry.

Professional Development & Growth

• Enhance your expertise through the rigorous evaluation process, refining your analytical skills, industry knowledge, and strategic thinking. Exposure to diverse business models, creative approaches, and best practices enriches your professional perspective.

Credibility & Prestige

• Your role as a NOVA Awards judge signifies excellence, integrity, and expertise. The association with a globally respected awards platform strengthens your professional reputation and positions you among the most influential figures in your field.

Meaningful Industry Contribution

• Play an integral role in recognizing and championing transformative achievements. Your evaluations help set industry benchmarks, drive innovation, and inspire excellence within the global business community.

Exclusive Access to the Judge’s Portal

• Gain entry to a dedicated platform designed for seamless and secure evaluation of entries. The portal provides an intuitive interface, detailed judging criteria, and a structured review process, ensuring a smooth and efficient assessment experience.

Official Recognition & Appreciation

Your invaluable contributions do not go unnoticed. Judges receive:
— A personalized Certificate of Appreciation
— Acknowledgment on the official NOVA Awards website
— Opportunities to showcase their expertise within the NOVA Awards community

Join the Legacy of Excellence
By serving as a NOVA Awards judge, you gain unparalleled exposure to the highest levels of industry achievement while cementing your reputation as a leader and innovator. If you are ready to make an impact, expand your influence, and contribute to shaping the future of excellence—apply now.

Do Professionals Have to Pay to Participate as a Judge in the NOVA Awards?

No, participation as a judge in the NOVA Awards is entirely free of charge. Judges are selected based on their expertise, professional accomplishments, and industry contributions—never through financial commitments or sponsorships. We uphold a rigorous, merit-based selection process to ensure that only the most qualified professionals take part, maintaining the integrity and credibility of the awards.

Serving as a judge is a prestigious and voluntary role that offers exceptional benefits, including:
✅ Industry Recognition – Gain acknowledgment as a leader in your field.
✅ Exclusive Networking – Connect with top-tier professionals and innovators.
✅ Influence & Impact – Play a pivotal role in recognizing groundbreaking achievements.

By maintaining a strictly non-monetary selection process, the NOVA Awards ensure that our judging panel remains impartial, credible, and dedicated solely to honoring true excellence.

Exclusive Opportunities to Judge the NOVA Europe Awards
Join an elite panel of experts evaluating the most groundbreaking innovations, businesses, and leaders across Europe. As a judge, you will play a key role in recognizing excellence and setting industry benchmarks. Each judge will receive an individual certificate for their participation in specific award categories.

Available Judging Categories:
NOVA Europe Awards for Business Leaders– Honoring outstanding corporate achievements, strategic growth, and leadership.
NOVA Europe Awards for Technology & Design – Recognizing disruptive technologies and pioneering digital advancements.
NOVA Europe Awards for Cybersecurity – Highlighting cutting-edge security solutions and compliance innovations.
NOVA Europe Awards for Influencer & Infobusiness – Showcasing emerging European businesses driving change.
NOVA Europe Awards for Marketing & Brand Strategy – Rewarding excellence in branding, communications, and digital strategy.
NOVA Europe Awards for Women in Business– Elevating female executives and entrepreneurs shaping industries.
NOVA Europe Awards for Young Innovators – Recognizing businesses committed to environmental and social responsibility.

How to Apply:

• Submit your application early for priority processing.
• Approvals and access will be granted as the judging period begins.
• A separate application is required for each category and must be submitted annually.
• Use the same email login across all applications for seamless access and participation.

Be part of a distinguished community of experts shaping Europe’s future of excellence. Apply today!

Important Dates and Deadlines for the Judging Process

There are 7 different awards and judging for each happens during the periods listed below. If you have applied to participate as one of the judges, you will receive judge’s confirmation only when the judging period has commenced. You may apply to participate as a judge in any number of awards listed below. Judges will receive a separate eCertificate for each awards program.

Understanding the Process for Approval as a NOVA Awards Judge

After submitting your application to become a judge, it will be reviewed by the NOVA team. If approved, you will receive an official approval letter once the judging period begins. Note that each awards program may have its own specific judging period.

Reasons for Delays in Approval:

1. Non-Professional Email Address: Using personal email domains like @gmail, @yahoo, or @aol may result in longer approval times.
2. Incomplete Employment Verification: Failing to provide links or proof of your professional status can delay the approval process.
3. Lack of Professional Photo: A professional photo is required to complete your judge profile.

Frequently Asked Questions:

Reasons Your Application Might Not Be Accepted

At the NOVA Awards, we uphold a high standard of excellence and integrity. If your application is not accepted, it may be due to the following reasons:

• Non-Professional Email: Only work or business email addresses are accepted.
• Email Domain Mismatch: Your email domain must match your place of employment or business.
• Lack of Employment Proof: You need to provide verifiable proof of employment, such as a LinkedIn profile or official company website.
• Incompatible Professional Background: If your expertise doesn’t align with the judging requirements for a particular program, your application may be declined.
• Incomplete Assignments in Previous Programs: Inconsistent completion of previous assignments may affect your eligibility.
• Lack of Scores or Professional Comments: Judges are expected to provide scores and professional feedback for all assignments.
• Verification Issues: If we can't verify your professional background or credentials, your application may be rejected.
• Duplicate Applications: Submitting multiple applications using different emails for the same awards program may lead to disqualification.

Email Policy and Judge Transparency Requirements

To maintain the integrity of the NOVA Awards, we verify email domains against your LinkedIn profile. Using personal or university emails may delay or invalidate your application. Additionally, all judges' full names and LinkedIn profiles are publicly displayed on the NOVA Awards website, ensuring transparency.

Disqualification and Permanent Bans

Judges can be disqualified or permanently banned from future participation for the following reasons:

• Providing False Information: Inaccurate details about your background or qualifications may result in disqualification.
• Unprofessional Behavior: Any rude or unprofessional conduct during communications or judging may lead to removal.
• Unauthorized Use or Disclosure of Assignment Content: Sharing or reproducing assignment content without permission will result in a permanent ban.
• Sharing Assignment Content: Judges must not share assignment materials with nominees or others outside the judging process.

These measures are in place to ensure the confidentiality and fairness of the NOVA Awards judging process.

How Assignments Are Counted

Once your application is approved, you will receive an email within 48 hours indicating that assignments have been added to your account for review and scoring

• Minimum Scoring Requirement: You may need to complete at least 50 assignments to qualify for judge benefits.
• Recused Assignments: If you recuse yourself from an assignment, it will not count towards your total, and a new task will be issued in its place.
• Disqualified Assignments: If assignments are disqualified, additional assignments will be provided to replace them.

This system ensures that all judges complete the necessary tasks while maintaining the integrity of the awards process.

Scoring Assignments

Accessing the Judge Portal

STEP 1: Log in to your account to access the Judging Panel.

STEP 2: Click “Continue into Judge Portal” to proceed.

STEP 3: You will see sections for # Pending, # Judges, and Action. Click “Open” under the Action section.

STEP 4: Select VIEW APPLICATION.

STEP 5: Read the full application on the left for each nomination.

• Review all the URLs and attachments submitted.
• Score each nomination on a scale of 1 to 10.
• Provide judge comments, noting what you liked or disliked about the nomination. Be sure to keep your comments professional and polite.

STEP 6: You can choose to:

• “Cancel and Go Back,”
• “Save and Back to List,”
• “Save and Go to Next.”

Note: You can stop scoring at any time and return to your work later by selecting VIEW APPLICATION.

NOVA Awards Judging Process: A Data-Driven Scoring System

The NOVA Awards uses a data-driven approach to ensure fairness, consistency, and transparency in its judging process. This structured method is the foundation for recognizing the best in the industry.

How the NOVA Awards Scoring Works

Our objective, data-driven scoring evaluates nominations across four key criteria, minimizing subjectivity and focusing on measurable achievements. The areas assessed include:

1. Achievement: Evaluates the nominee's most notable accomplishment.
2. Main Content: Assesses the depth, clarity, and relevance of the submission essay.
3. Summary: Judges the impact and conciseness of the key highlights summarizing why the nominee deserves recognition.
4. Supporting Materials: Evaluates the relevance and credibility of any supplemental content, such as URLs or attachments.

Scoring Scale

Judges use the following standardized scale to assign scores:

The total score for each nomination is the sum of all four criteria, resulting in a final score out of 10.

Award Levels

The final score determines the award level:

Judge Responsibilities

As a judge, you are responsible for:

1. Thoroughly Reviewing Each Nomination

• Read and analyze all parts of each submission, including supporting materials.
• Ensure the achievement aligns with the criteria.
• Allocate adequate time for a fair evaluation.

2. Assigning Scores Objectively

• Apply the scoring scale consistently across all nominations.
• Focus solely on the information provided, avoiding personal biases.

3. Completing Assignments on Time

• Follow all submission deadlines to maintain the integrity of the judging process.

Why the Data-Driven Method is Superior

Fair and Objective

The NOVA Awards’ structured scoring system ensures consistency and fairness in judging. By eliminating subjectivity, we provide clear and measurable evaluations.

Transparent and Credible

The final scores are calculated mathematically, ensuring no room for bias or manipulation. The clearly defined process also ensures nominees understand how their entries are judged.

Global Expertise

Our judges are industry leaders from around the world, offering diverse perspectives while maintaining consistency in scoring. This global approach guarantees that winners meet a world-class standard.

Encourages Excellence

The scoring thresholds for Gold, Silver, and Bronze awards ensure that only those demonstrating significant achievements are recognized. Achieving Gold requires four “Well Done” scores, reflecting outstanding performance.

Innovative and Scalable

This modern, efficient, and scalable method allows the NOVA Awards to handle a large volume of nominations without compromising quality.

Judges: Upholding the NOVA Europe Awards’ Gold Standard

As a judge, you play a crucial role in preserving the integrity and prestige of the NOVA Europe Awards. Your expertise and unbiased evaluation ensure that only the most deserving individuals, companies, and innovations are recognized for their outstanding achievements.

If you have any questions regarding the judging process, scoring criteria, or category guidelines, please reach out to the NOVA Europe Awards team at [email address].

Thank you for your dedication and commitment! Your insights and professionalism contribute to elevating industry standards and celebrating excellence across Europe.

Guidelines and Best Practices for Evaluating Submissions

Scoring Process

Each entry is carefully reviewed and assigned a score by the judges on a scale of 1 to 10, based on the following criteria:

• Excellent (Score: 10)
• Very Good (Score: 9)
• Good (Score: 8)
• Above Average (Score: 7)
• Average (Score: 6)
• Ordinary (Score: 5)
• Below Average (Score: 4)
• Poor (Score: 3)
• Poorest (Score: 2)
• Avoid (Score: 1)

How Scores Decide Winners

The scores given by all judges are compiled, and an average score is calculated for each entry. Based on these average scores, the winners are categorized as follows:

Winners

• Gold: Typically, an average score of 9 to 10.
• Silver: Typically, an average score of 8 to 8.99.
• Bronze: Typically, an average score of 7 to 7.99.

Non-Winners

Entries with average scores ranging from 0 to 6.99 are considered non-winners. These submissions generally lack quality and will not likely qualify for a Bronze award or any higher recognition. It is crucial to ensure that scores below 7 are carefully considered before assigning.

Scoring Considerations

When assigning a score, keep in mind the following factors:

1. Achievement: Has the nominee clearly highlighted a significant accomplishment? Nominees are generally expected to focus on one main achievement per entry.
2. Supporting Essay/Video: Does the nominee provide a detailed explanation of their achievement through written or video content?
3. Supporting Materials: Has the nominee included sufficient content to substantiate their claims?
4. Startups Categories: For startups, does the nominee provide evidence of their founding year, along with a clear description of one major achievement?

Recusing from Assignments

Scoring Assignments Without Industry Expertise

For categories requiring more general knowledge or not specific to a certain industry, judges should rely heavily on the provided content. In these cases, the relevance and quality of supporting materials are crucial.

Recusal as a Judge

If you believe you are not qualified to score an assignment due to potential conflicts of interest or lack of impartiality, you may recuse yourself. Please provide a reason for recusal to ensure transparency.

Judge’s Comments Guidelines

We ask judges to provide constructive and thoughtful feedback for each entry. Your comments help entrants understand their strengths and areas for improvement. These comments will be visible only to the nominees, maintaining the anonymity of the judges and ensuring fairness.

Constructive Feedback:

• Provide personalized, actionable insights. Focus on strengths and areas for improvement, highlighting specific aspects of each entry.
• Avoid generic comments. Tailor your feedback to each entry, discussing the application’s unique features.
• Use professional and respectful language, maintaining anonymity.

Impact of Comments:

Your feedback is crucial for the entrants’ development and may also be used in their marketing efforts. Your comments can have a lasting impact on their professional growth

Guidelines for Providing Feedback to Entrants

At NOVA Europe Awards, we encourage judges to offer thoughtful, structured, and actionable feedback to help entrants refine their work and elevate industry standards. Below are key principles for crafting impactful evaluations:

Be Specific
Focus on particular aspects of the entry—innovation, impact, execution, or presentation. Highlight what made the submission stand out and provide precise areas for enhancement.

Example:
"Your product’s market impact section was particularly strong, but including a more detailed implementation timeline would enhance clarity."

Be Constructive
Acknowledge both strengths and areas for improvement. Offer clear, actionable suggestions that help entrants refine their submissions.

Example:
"Your concept is highly innovative, but providing data-driven insights to support your claims would strengthen the credibility of your presentation."

Be Balanced
Ensure feedback includes both positive recognition and constructive suggestions. This motivates entrants while giving them clear guidance on improvement.

Example:
"Your research was thorough and well-structured. Enhancing the visuals, however, would improve clarity and engagement."

Personalize the Feedback
Tailor your comments to each individual entry. This ensures the feedback is meaningful, relevant, and directly applicable.

Example:
"Your attention to detail in the user experience design was exceptional and contributed to a seamless interface, making the product stand out."

Use a Standardized Format
To maintain consistency and clarity, consider structuring your feedback with specific prompts:

• What aspect of the submission was most impactful?
• How did the submission demonstrate innovation or strategic thinking?
• What improvements could enhance its effectiveness in future iterations?

Your expertise and commitment to constructive evaluation help uphold the prestige of the NOVA Europe Awards and support the continuous evolution of industry excellence. Thank you for your dedication!

Understanding the NOVA Awards Scoring Guidelines

The NOVA Awards celebrate excellence across various sectors, and as a judge, your role is essential in maintaining the integrity and prestige of the awards. By following these scoring guidelines, we ensure that each submission is assessed in a fair, transparent, and consistent manner

Scoring Scale

• 10: Excellence – The entry sets the standard for innovation, execution, and impact within its category, serving as a benchmark for others to follow.
• 9.0 to 9.9 (Gold): Outstanding Achievement – This entry displays exceptional quality, surpassing most expectations in its field, making it worthy of the prestigious Gold NOVA distinction.
• 8.0 to 8.9 (Silver): Excellent – The entry demonstrates superior performance and innovation, deserving recognition as a Silver NOVA winner.
• 7.0 to 7.9 (Bronze): Very Good – The entry shows commendable quality and achievement, meriting the Bronze NOVA recognition.

Entries with scores within these ranges are considered winners and will receive the appropriate award based on their average score across all judges.

Guidelines for Scoring

• Objective Evaluation: Assess each entry based on its merits, using the criteria defined for its category. Consider factors such as innovation, impact, execution, and overall quality.
• Constructive Feedback: Provide helpful feedback, especially for entries scoring below 7.0, to assist participants in improving and resubmitting.
• Use the Full Scale: Be thoughtful and use the entire scoring scale to differentiate between varying levels of achievement.
• Consistency and Fairness: Maintain consistency across evaluations. Review scores collectively to ensure they accurately represent the differences in achievement levels.
• Consideration for a Score of 0: Review the entry thoroughly before assigning a 0, ensuring it truly meets the criteria for this score, as it indicates a failure to meet the standard for recognition and may include false or misleading information.

The average score of all participating judges will determine the distinction for each entry. It is crucial to uphold diligence and integrity to maintain the high standards of the NOVA Awards.

Anonymity of Judges

As a judge, it’s essential to remain anonymous while providing your feedback. Your scores and comments are anonymous, ensuring that nominees cannot trace their scores back to individual judges. This encourages a fair and open evaluation process.

While offering comments, be polite, respectful, and constructive. Your feedback should focus on the entry’s strengths and areas for improvement, without revealing your identity. This anonymity upholds fairness and impartiality in the evaluation process.

Judges’ Profile, eBadge, eCertificate, Reference Letter

• Judges’ Profiles: Moving forward, only the judge's full name and organization will be published alongside a link to their LinkedIn profile. This ensures that the most current and comprehensive information is available.

• Timeline: Judges who complete at least 50 assignments will have their full name and LinkedIn profile published on the judges’ page after winners are announced.

• Recognition for Judges: Judges who complete 50 assignments or more for any awards program will receive an eBadge and eCertificate specific to that program. Judges who complete fewer than 50 assignments will be acknowledged with a special ‘Thank You’ mention on the judges’ page.

• Printed Certificates: Starting in 2024, printed certificates will no longer be mailed, though they can be purchased by those wishing for a physical copy. The production and shipping time frame is 6-8 weeks after the confirmed order.

• Reference Letters: Judges completing at least 50 assignments are eligible for a reference letter, which will be issued digitally through services such as Docusign.

• Work/Business Email: Judges must maintain an up-to-date work or business email for communication and verification purposes. Changes to email can affect the issuance of eBadges and eCertificates.

Judges who complete fewer than 10 assignments will not be eligible for any recognitions. However, their contributions will be acknowledged on the judges’ page under “Participating Judges Acknowledgment.”

These updates reflect our dedication to recognizing the contributions of our judges and maintaining transparency about their professional credentials. We greatly value their involvement, which plays a key role in the success of the NOVA Awards.

Resources for Judges

Disclaimer Regarding the Use of NOVA Europe Awards Recognition

The NOVA Europe Awards celebrate excellence across industries, recognizing individuals and organizations for their outstanding achievements. Participation as a judge or award recipient is a mark of professional distinction and industry leadership.

However, the NOVA Europe Awards and its affiliates do not guarantee or imply any professional benefits beyond recognition, including but not limited to immigration approvals, visa status changes, employment opportunities, or career advancements. The use of judging or winning status for such purposes is discouraged, and NOVA Europe Awards disclaims any responsibility for misinterpretation or misuse of award recognition.


Background Images for Judges to Use on Social Media

To showcase your role as a NOVA Europe Awards Judge, you may download and use the official background images for your LinkedIn profile or other professional networks.

🔹 Download Official Judge’s Background
🔹 Access Brand Guidelines

By using these materials, you align with the values of excellence, integrity, and innovation, reinforcing your role in recognizing industry-leading achievements.

For any further inquiries, please contact the NOVA Europe Awards team at [contact email].

Requesting a Reference Letter from NOVA Europe Awards

At NOVA Europe Awards, we are currently experiencing an exceptionally high volume of reference letter requests, with over a thousand pending. We recognize the importance of these letters and are dedicated to processing them as efficiently as possible. However, due to the sheer volume, manually handling each request has become increasingly challenging.

To ensure a streamlined and timely process, we kindly request that you use digital signature platforms such as DocuSign, HelloSign, or similar services. These platforms have significantly expedited request processing in the past, allowing us to maintain efficiency and accuracy.

For your convenience, we have provided a step-by-step guide on utilizing these digital services. You can access this guide through the NOVA Europe Awards Reference Letter Procedure.

Please note: Due to the high request volume, we are currently unable to accept email attachments for reference letter requests.

We truly appreciate your understanding and cooperation during this busy period. Thank you for being part of the NOVA Europe Awards community and for your continued support.

Can a Judge Apply for an Award?

At the NOVA Awards, we uphold fairness and equality for all participants, including our esteemed judges. If a judge wishes to submit their own entries, they must follow the same application process, undergo the same review procedure, and pay any applicable fees as any other participant. This ensures a fair competition and upholds the integrity of the awards.